Isner-Mahut and Wimbledon: Triumph of will or failure of tennis?

Mahut-Isner: 40-40. No, not deuce. That’s the score in the fifth set of this match at Wimbledon that has captured the attention of Americans recovering from Landon Donovan’s goal.

The stats boggle the mind. John Isner has 83 aces to Nicolas Mahut’s 69. Match duration: 458 minutes. ESPN’s crew has run out of superlatives.

Then come the stats that raise questions. Mahut has won 22% of his receiving points, and he’s 1-for-1 on his lone break point back in the second set. Isner has won 21% of his receiving points, and he’s 1-for-12 on break points … 0-for-3 in the fifth.

In other words, neither guy can return the other’s serve.

The way tennis has been going over the past several years, with racket technology and ramped-up serves, is that a surprise? And is that what we really want to see in tennis? Or is it time to tone down the rackets or move back the service line?

This entry was posted in tennis and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Isner-Mahut and Wimbledon: Triumph of will or failure of tennis?

  1. Mr. Dure, what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

  2. Beau Dure says:

    Ouch. Not sure whether to ask you to elaborate or tap out.

  3. It’s a movie quote, don’t read too much into it

  4. I think, it is real, I will take part in talk. Alongside one another we could visit the right respond to.

Leave a Reply